nuevo diario feb 16, 2007

Alibis of Volz smell of false testimony *** First time that accused spoke, was for admitting that presumed pals had indicated it before implied Police like in the murder *** Divaga giving to understand that accusation comes from Nicaraguan rivals in real estate and slides with schedules that return it ubicuo *** Employees of company of rent of vehicles give details on how attending of Volz he tried to manipulate them so that they propped up lies of the indicated one LÉSBER QUINTERO And HEBERTO RODRIGUEZ Eric Stanley Volz. Photo Miguel Molina/END.
Eric Stanley Volz broke silenced yesterday during the second day of the judgment that is made by the atrocious murder of his girlfriend, Doris Ivania Jiménez Alvarado, denying all the signallings whom there is in his against, in spite of admitting that the other defendant of the case, Julio Martín Chamorro, indicated it of being the main author of this crime that he has shaken to great part of the population of the department of Rivas. This happened in I confront that it carried out the Police in the investigativo process. This affirmation even surprised the representatives of the Public Ministry, because it comes to ratify the testimony rendered by police agent Silvio Aguirre, investigator of the case, whom it testified that when captured Chamorro Lopez, it said to him that Stanley Volz had offered him five thousand dollars so that it participated in the case. In its declaration, Stanley Volz also recognized that the Nelson witness Lopez Dangla in another one confronted the past indicated it of having been in the scene of crime 21 of November. Volz maintained that Chamorro Lopez during I confront until said to him that first in violating Was arming it Llanes and soon he (Volz). "Then I realized of which it was in serious problem", it added before the judicial one. Soon it declared that these versions were false and took advantage of to also deny that he was a jealous man, as they have maintained witnesses to it who identified themselves like friends of the victim. Stanley Volz also denied that it had money to him to Doris Ivania, as said in its pertaining to a witness declaration Mercedes Alvarado, mother of the now murdered one. Excuse without sense Also, I let glimpse that it has been involved in this case because he is partner of a company of real estate of name "Century 21", and for him "in east Nicaragua business has much competition and many companies speak bad of the others". Stanley Volz insisted on its declaration as far as which the day of the crime was in Managua, and that it left there towards San Juan of the South about the five afternoon, opposing the witnesses who assure that it was in San Juan of the South that day. In agreement with his testimony, to the hour of the crime it was in a teleconferencing with Ricardo journalist Castle and the North American Nick Purdy, that then was in Georgia. The three talked of businesses, because they tried to reach agreements to fortify a magazine that Stanley Volz has. It until death did not give importance him After the teleconferencing, Stanley Volz declared that it went to have lunch with Castle, soon cut the hair in the offices that it has in colonial the Oaks, where ordered to rent a vehicle to Hertz Rent to Car, after finding out, about the 2:43 of afternoon, which her fiancèe had died. This information obtained it through a call that did to him from San Juan of the South, to the hour before indicated, Gabriela Sovalbarro, friend of the victim. But Stanley Volz left Managua supposedly until the five of afternoon and arrived at the scene of the crime between the 6:30 from afternoon and seven at night. On the other hand, Gabriela indicated yesterday that when warned to him Volz of the happened thing to Doris, it did not notice it so surprised and she did not cry either. It added that the victim had commented to him who if Volz found out that it "stuck" killed it. With this testimony already they are the two witnesses who give faith of the death threats that the foreigner did to him to Doris Ivania.
The witness Jose Antonio Herrera explained that with the only one who the victim locked in itself in her store she was with Stanley Volz, and that of with anybody, and until expressed more there that already at three moments it had seen the defendant and the victim lock in itself in the store, and with tears in its eyes she did a call to him to Chamorro Lopez so that she spoke and she counted everything, and did not continue making undergo its mother. They tried to manipulate to those of Rent to Car In the parade of witnesses also appeared two employees of Hertz Rent to Car: Víctor Jose Morales and Indira Leiva Garci'a, and both were clear when indicating that at no moment they saw Stanley Volz making and signing the corresponding proceedings to carry out the rent of the vehicle that used to go to Rivas. Leiva indicated that the transaction occurred between one and two of afternoon, which contradicts the declarations that the own Volz gave, since it said that it was about the three of afternoon that came to order that they rented the vehicle to him. Also, it indicated that the assistant of Stanley Volz insisted on later days in asking for documents to him that pointed out that the defendant was in Managua and that got to make the proceedings of the rent from the vehicle, but the request was denied to them. Another one of which it declared yesterday was the official of the Police of Rivas, Pedro Narváez, that got to confirm that the day of the crime in a suspicious attitude saw Julio Martín Chamorro Lopez, and that was it to 90 meters of the store of Doris Ivania about the 12:45 of afternoon, and until specified that it saw it with scratches in one of its arms. In addition to the testimony of Stanley Volz, the defense called to declare to Ricardo journalist Castle and Nick Purdy, who indicated that they were in the teleconferencing with the defendant and who this one supposedly occurred from the office located in the Oaks. According to Castle, one was with Volz from the 12 of noon, and the teleconferencing lasted 55 minutes and soon they had lunch. Other than located to Stanley Volz in Managua was the estilista Rosy Elena Estrada, that said that it called so that it got to cut it the hair to the Oaks, arriving at the indicated place to 2:00 from afternoon and left three hours later. The last one in declaring yesterday was the young person Yamir Broob González, proposed by the defense of Chamorro Lopez. In his intervention it related that the day of the crime of Doris Ivania, got at nine in the morning to look for the defendant his house so that it served as translator his fiancèe to him, a Canadian that no longer is in the country. Supposedly that day the Lopez in the market of San Jun of the South had lunch next to Chamorro, and to the one of afternoon every one she went to his house. With this testimony it concluded the second part of this judgment. The process was postponed because they lacked two witnesses whom the defense counsel of Chamorro proposed Lopez, and the judge of judgment of Rivas, Ivette White, reprogramó to initiate to nine in the morning of today and possibly today same Toruño concludes. BOX OPTIMISTIC PARTS the lawyer Red Ramon reduced importance to the contradictions that exist according to the hour that supposedly rented the vehicle. "What is hour, distance, nobody go to serte exact, but it is the document there that I presented/displayed with the hour that arrived the vehicle. Always phase angle has his of half an hour, nobody decides, but in fact hour exact it document goes to give that I presented/displayed, that says to three and some ", said. On the result of both first days of judgments, Red one was very satisfied, although it does not discard the culpability verdict. "I always am optimistic, but the last word has the judge, if he is guilty or is innocent. If culprit declares, because we are going it to continue defending through resources for above, in Appeals. Grosería would be one to say that they are going it to condemn or that they are going it to acquit... ". On the affirmations of its defendant during its declaration, Red it emphasized the shown sincerity. "Volz said, to vos sabés to it that he was sincere, it could remain shut up, but he said what happened". On the other hand, the auxiliary public prosecutor Jorge Téllez explained that indeed "those contradictions are those that base the request of a culpability verdict. We already knew that the witnesses came to lie in the opinion and she confirmed herself with the information that gave the people of the company ". Imagínate which they called to the Hertz company renting a vehicle, inclusively before they found the body of the victim. The Hertz company says that was around the one of afternoon and the two body found it to and average then, just by that... ", in addition," cut the hair, called to all people and was maintaining a communication with a North American. To the hour that was having lunch supposedly was also speaking on the telephone, that is a madness ". The representative of the Public Ministry finalized saying that "there are sufficient elements, are sufficient tests. The case was better from which waited for the Office of the public prosecutor, there was certainty, but the test indicates that we are better of which we thought ". Related connections: